The Neglected Art of (Timely) Pruning Lemons: Part 2

In Part 1 of this blog, I wrote about why so many angels, venture investors and even entrepreneurs continue pouring resources into investment lemons well after they should have pruned them and moved on.  It is well known in the venture business that the deals investors most regret are not those that crash and burn quickly, but rather those that never get anywhere worth going but never completely fail either: the proverbial land of the living dead.  These are the deals that take – ultimately waste –  the most time and capital.  One of the less understood talents of the best venture investors – and I don’t think anyone gets a perfect score on this one – is the ability to recognize a deal that is headed for zombie land and kill it off before it gets there.

In the age of the lean startup, when pivoting is all the rage (and often the right thing to do) lemons that need pruning rather than pivoting are harder than ever to spot.  Be that as it may, there are, I think, some clues that investors should watch out for – and be ready to act on.  The first, I think, is at the very place where most good investments start – with the team.

In looking back at my own experiences in zombie land, by far the most common regret – the most common “I should have seen this coming” epiphany – was realizing that the deal lived beyond the point at which confidence in the team had materially slipped from the initial investment.  Most venture investors think the quality of the team is the single most important factor in the investment decision equation.  Nevertheless, I am struck, in my experience as an investor, entrepreneur, and counsel to one or the other, how investors will throw more resources into a deal after their confidence in the quality of the team has fallen below the level at which the initial investment would never have been made.  So, my first rule of lemon pruning: don’t throw more resources at a deal unless after a fresh evaluation you still have the kind of confidence in the team that would support an initial investment.  The test, in this regard, is not whether the team has made any mistakes, but rather, if you were seeing this team for the first time, with the current lemon experience behind them, would you consider them worthy of backing in their next deal?

The next place to look for a lemon is in the “day late and dollar short” aisle.  A lot of the zombies that I have seen are deals that missed the market or technology wave and, rather than wait for the next wave (i.e. bail on the existing business) think that if only they paddle hard and fast enough they can catch back up.  Alas, it almost never happens that way.  As long as you are not too far out in front of a wave, you can plausibly think about waiting for the wave to catch up,  But once you are looking at the back of the wave, forget it.  Thus, my second rule of lemon pruning: don’t lose sight of the market and technology wave you are riding, and if at some point you find yourself on the back side of it – swim, briskly, to the nearest beach.

Finally, in the age of the pivot too many folks are too quick to think that just because you have a great team to attack market opportunity X, you can, when market X does not pan out, just pick another attractive market opportunity, say Y, and go for it.  While that can happen, you have to be very careful, I think, to honestly ask yourself if you and the team have any right going after market opportunity Y.  Recognizing a good market opportunity – and let’s say Y is in fact a good market opportunity – is not the same as being able to capture it.  A pivot only makes sense if the post-pivot team really knows enough about the dynamics (distribution channels, competitive landscape, business models, etc.) of that market to knock off the people already immersed in the market (at least some of whom you have to assume are competent) and has the connections and capital to execute.  Thus my third rule of lemon pruning: avoid pivots that take you to markets you don’t know an awful lot about and/or don’t have realistic access to the capital and other resources you need to successfully attack.

In the interests of full disclosure, while I have over the years spent a lot of time thinking about why investors don’t timely prune more investment lemons, most of my thinking focused on what makes pruning a lemon so hard to do.  More recently, it has occurred that more timely lemon pruning would happen if lemons were not so hard to recognize.  In that regard, it would be great to hear what others are thinking in terms of timely recognizing investment lemons.


About Paul A. Jones

Serial venture capital backed entrepreneur, angel investor and venture capital investor; Co-chair of the VentureBest team at Michael Best & Friedrich, LLP.
This entry was posted in Angel Investing, Entrepreneurship, Venture Capital, Venture Captal and Angel Investing and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to The Neglected Art of (Timely) Pruning Lemons: Part 2

  1. Adam Perkins says:

    Great advice. Caught this post off of twitter. I’m at an interesting crossroads and am putting together a new team for a new project. Great stuff to have in mind before jumping in.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s